Live Free and Starve vs. The Singer Solution to World Poverty

The author of Live Free believes that the children who are forced into child labor would actuall be in a worse position if they were free. The author of Singer Solution believes we should stop upgrading and buying useless things and donate money to the poor. I probably have a reader's bias towards the second article because I feel very strongly towards children and their rights. However I don't agree with either of the articles completely I disagree that we shouldn't fight child labor with the first article but feel that you don't have to just give any extra money you have away. Against the first article I have a statement it makes: "[the government's of the countries that need child labor banned], mired in countless other problems seem incapable of bringing [food, clothing, and medication] to them." It seems to me that these nations need to step up and do something about this. I disagree with the idea proposed in the other document that there is no "distinction between a Brazilian who sells a homeless child to organ peddlers and an American who already has a TV and upgrades to a better one." I feel this is a silly question because obviously selling people is different than buying a inanimate object like a TV. I support neither of these arguments and feel that anyone who supports either is quite silly.